What is all this niddah vs zava stuff anyway?

Posted by Desde la Oscuridad at 02:28 PM on May 04, 2005 | TrackBack

On Avigayil's post "and how are the benefits" there's a discussion in the comments about the different waiting times to be purified from niddah vs from zavah, and Avigayil adds this: At some point 2500 years ago "the women" decided that it was too difficult to keep track of which bleeding was niddah bleeding and which bleeding was zavah bleeding so they took a stringency upon themselves to consider all bleeding zavah bleeding and wait the seven clean days in all cases. This has become the custom, and thus the practice of observant women even today.

From Beneath, among others (myself included), would like to slap these women "upside the head" and Swurgle wants to know why we can't just undo that decision.

So in the interest of clarification, I did a little research into what exactly is the difference between niddah and zava and how can you tell? And my first instinct is to duck and run! You think the current niddah laws are complicated? Here's the link I found. It's a pdf file, and the part about distinguishing between niddah and zava starts on page 5.

Please remember I am not a posek, consult your own Rav, etc., but this is the way I understand the shuir.

To summarize: first you have to decide which opinion you are following. (There seem to be at least two) Let's say you hold by the Rambam. First you have to remember the exact date of your first "discharge," ie period. Anyone? I can tell you how old I was, approximately, and whether it was day or night, but after all, it was about 20 years ago, and I don't even remember which month it was, or what day of the week, much less the exact date! Now why is this date so important? because the Rambam holds that from there you start counting alternating "windows" (the shuir calls them periods, but that's too confusing for me, so I changed it) of 7 days and 11 days, whether or not you experience any bleeding on those days. Are you following so far? Any bleeding that comes during a 7-day window is Dam Niddah (dam is blood) and any bleeding that comes during an 11 day window is Dam Ziva. ("Ziva" blood makes you a "Zava"... the vowels don't really count in Hebrew. They change conjugation and usage but not meaning.)

A bit of halacha on "waiting times": Dam Niddah requires a seven day wait from the first day of blood, as long as bleeding has stopped by that seventh day. Dam Ziva that lasts only 1 or two days requires a one day blood-free wait, but Dam Ziva that lasts three or more days requires sheva neki'im, the seven days of no bleeding at all, before immersing in a mikvah.

To be fair, most poskim make it a little easier than the Rambam does. Any discharge renders you Niddah... the first seven days are all niddah days, then the next 11 are Ziva days, then it goes back to Niddah days (but not back again) so you wouldn't really become a Zava unless your cycle was less than 18 days long. At this point I was beginning to think it wasn't so difficult after all, and we really should go back to distinguishing between niddah and zava. Then I noticed something from an earlier page in the shuir that I'd glossed over the first time I read it. The point about what exactly is "Dam Niddah."

It sounds like the real killer, the real reason we don't distinguish anymore, has nothing to do with Niddah vs Zava days, but everything to do with colors. Yes, colors. To insure that blood is really Dam Niddah, it not only needs to come during the "Dam Niddah Days," but it also needs to be one of 5 very specific shades of blood that are actually tamei (impure). Without showing every single stain to a Rav trained in distinguishing those colors(all of which are different reds, by the way), a woman wouldn't know for sure that the blood qualified as Dam Niddah.

For that reason, the Rebbeim instituted that where there is no such trained Rav available in a community, women must do the following:

For a one day discharge, a woman is almost definitely a Zava Katana, ("little Zava")which would require one blood-free day before visiting the mikvah. However, just in case it really was Dam Niddah, she waits the full seven days of Niddah (not seven blood-free days, just seven days, but since this was from a one-day discharge, 6 of them are blood-free)

For a two day discharge, she waits 8 days, in case the first day was Dam Ziva, and the second day was Dam Niddah, so the seven day minimum starts from the second day.

For a three or more day discharge, she probably becomes a Zava Gedolah, a "big" zava, which necessitates the sheva neki'im, or seven non-bleeding days. If any of the blood is really Dam Niddah, the seven day waiting period is included within this by default.

Eventually it became the custom to hold by sheva neki'im even for one day's discharge, on the basis that it was too confusing otherwise. Now that last bit doesn't seem reasonable to me... but I do see how it might be confusing, and, after all, I didn't make the rules.

Okay, everyone take a deep breath. Just one more thing I want to mention.

No one said anything about a 5 day minimum before starting the sheva neki'im, right? Doesn't appear in the shuir at all. So where does that come from? How did we get from even with being extra stringent, 7, 8, or 10+ (if you bleed for 3 or more) days to a minimum of 12? Well, it seems you can't count a day as a "clean day" if you are dripping... semen. This is where the math gets very funky. The sages tell us that after sex, you drip semen for up to three days. Semen being clear, you can't tell by looking at a bedikah cloth (without a microscope) whether it is present. So you need to wait three days before starting sheva neki'im. Wait, but 3 days isn't 5! Even assuming you don't have eden's mazel, and had sex 5 minutes before you became niddah, that's still only 3 days! Well, see, for the 5 days, 1 minute before sunset counts as a whole day of bleeding. But the 3 days of dripping are really 72 hours, so that could halachically stretch over pieces of 4 days, and if the days are in the process of getting shorter, (during the time of year where it drops by over a minute a day) and you time it just right, those 72 hours could possibly overlap a tiny piece into a 5th halachic day. (I think... I didn't actually do the math, but I think that's what I remember.) So Chazal threw in that extra day just for fun. That's why Kallahs only need to wait 4 and not 5... the 5th day is a stringency. Also today's Rebbeim can play with the 5 day thing in cases of need. And the whole thing is moot if you didn't actually have relations right before you started bleeding, but apparently that's too much to expect us to keep track of as well.

So I'm still not a posek, and those of us who agreed to follow halacha l'maaseh (practical halacha) as it stands are kind of stuck, but as an intellectual exercise, now you have all the details for figuring out what the "real" halachic way to do things was before Chazal started taking pity on us poor math and memory challenged women and making it more difficult so it would be less confusing for us.

And yes, it is confusing, and yes, it is a lot to keep track of, and yes, we are all busy women who can't remember from one end of the sheva neki'im to the other which day we made the hefsek taharah on... but that's why we keep calendars, right? So keep in mind most women were basically illiterate during the times of Chazal, and even if they could write they didn't have (and couldn't have afforded anyway) our neat little pocket calendars and a pencil, and then maybe it all makes sense.

And if anyone wants to challenge my reasoning and/or math, or correct any mistakes I've made, go right ahead. I'm not any sort of expert, I've just done a bit of reading on the subject.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for What is all this niddah vs zava stuff anyway?:

Comments

On May 4, 2005 at 03:37 PM, Avigayil said:

THANKS! This was explained to me at one point and made my head spin (enough) that I couldn't remember details, and it is kind of having the same effect now. But important, yes.

On May 4, 2005 at 08:52 PM, fromBeneath said:

Thanks so much for doing this research, Desde, but OWWWW did it make my head hurt!

I need to go take an aspirin and read it again.

The funny thing is, I bet I could figure out exactly when I got my very first period, if I had access to my school log. It was the same day we saw a health film on menstruation. So if my old school keeps course content records for a bajillion years, I could figure it out!

On May 4, 2005 at 11:15 PM, Desde said:

I found the link before Pesach, but it made my head spin enough that I couldn't actually come to write this post until this week!

If my school had really good records, I could figure out when my first period was too... I was in a special program two afternoons a week where I got out of class and got to do fun things instead, and we were doing a unit on bank accounts and such (fake stocks were involved too). That day I got a "birthday check" from "my Aunt Zelda" for $50 to deposit in my fake bank account. I remember it was nowhere near my real birthday, but the unit ended before we got to my real birthday. I only later made the connection that it had been a "birthday" of sorts. So it was in the fall, but I no longer even remember which days of the week I went to that program!

On May 5, 2005 at 02:53 AM, eden said:

Hee. I'm with fromBeneath; I was doing so well until you got to the 5 days part, and then OWWWW. But thank you, Desde, I was really scratching my head after reading Avigayil's summary last time - I was sure there was something about being able to tell shades of red apart, not just keeping track of days. But I couldn't find it in my kallah class notes.

But I'm also still with fB on slapping those women upside the head! (Hahahahaha, thank you for that, fB, it's my new favorite quote.) I'm not sure the illiteracy argument explains much, either... they still had to keep track of all the vestot, which I personally can't do without counting on a calendar. They must have been pretty good at this type of calculation.

On May 5, 2005 at 09:17 AM, talia said:

This sounds very similar to a shiur my kallah teacher gave. We spent most of that class debating colours and the requirment today to wait. I believe everyone in the class was ready to find a time machine and kindly ask those women to reconsider.

I also remember distinctly when she spoke about the need to wait in case you had sex right before becoming niddah, because you might be dripping semen. And then the trickyness of the math. That was a memoriable class for me. Things just finally clicked. I had never thought about the semen after they had been "properly" discharged (how to word this?) But many things about judaism finally clicked. In a good way.

Desde, thank you for all your research.

On May 5, 2005 at 01:48 PM, Desde said:

I liked my illiteracy theory! Hmmm... vestot are hard enough to keep track of with a calendar, that's true. But I get the feeling they made their husbands do that part. And I can't imagine the husbands being willing to deal with all the rest of the calculations too.

I'm not sure where I get that impression, though, unless it's just that I've seen so many times places where it says "sit down with your wife and help her with the calculations..." I find that amusing, because while I'm sure many couples do figure it out together, my husband relies on me completely to do all the calculations and keep him informed of upcoming onot. But it's his job to tell me when Rosh Chodesh is coming.

On May 5, 2005 at 03:57 PM, fromBeneath said:

If I haven't said it enough already, I need to say it again: I am so grateful for this website. I have to go back to my kalla class notes, because I don't remember my teacher saying anything about -ahem- dripping after, erm, relations. This seems like all new information to me! But some things about the calculations are starting to make a little more sense.

talia wrote about "the need to wait in case you had sex right before becoming niddah, because you might be dripping semen..." Wait for what? Wait to make a hefsek? That would go back to that day 4 vs. day 5 thing, right? Ah, more learning!

Guess I'll have to slap my kallah teacher upside the head, too. ;) (*waves to eden*)

On May 5, 2005 at 04:27 PM, t said:

VERY IMPRESSIVE. You did a much better job of explaining this then the Rov who gives the Daf Yomi Shiur I go to.

On May 6, 2005 at 08:03 AM, talia said:

i know of a couple where the husband keeps the calendar. they are blessed with many beautiful children k'ah (no evil eye). but it seems weird to me. she told me it was actually easier for her to have him do it since she has such long breaks due to nursing, she forgets the "rules", and with day-to-day mommy concerns it's easiest for her husband to keep track.

I'll get back to you on the waiting part. I don't want to say something wrong..

On May 12, 2005 at 11:38 AM, shanna said:

You know what really bothers me about this? Where did the Rambam get the idea that anyone's cycle is eighteen days long?

On May 13, 2005 at 08:13 AM, Ruchama said:

I suspect that this is a matter of interpreting gemarah idiosyncratically rather than an actual assumption about female biology. But this discussion has made me realize, for the umpteenth time, that I really ought to learn masechet niddah. Maybe after I finish the masechet that I'm learning now. That should only take about a decade or two...

On May 18, 2005 at 09:26 PM, callieischatty said:

I know where did rambam decide all this? Mine is 30 days!
Is a woman a niddah after she is with her husband for the first time?
there is blood, then is she niddah?

On May 19, 2005 at 10:44 AM, eden said:

Yes, a woman becomes a niddah from first intercourse with her husband - sometimes even if there is no blood. You can find more details here.

On May 26, 2005 at 02:37 AM, tircha said:

Historically speaking, it's not even 100% clear that the women of Israel DID take on the practice of zavah for themselves--we have a book with men saying that they did, but absolutely nothing in which those women speak for themselves.
Further, it's possible that if the women did take on the extra week for themselves, it was due to the Zoroastrian influence of their Babylonian context. Zoroastrianism was much stricter than even Judaism in terms of matters of purity and impurity.
On the very same ammud of gemara, it says that R. Yehuda HaNasi made a humra for people in the country (and only in the country) to turn all niddah to zava, because if there was a question about a stain, there was no rabbinical counsel around to consult, so better safe than sorry. Somehow that only-if-there's-no-rav-around disclamer became the universal.

The fact that heathy, normal niddah became conflated with zavah is more complicated than is at least usually told.
Women and Water by Brandeis University Press has a great historical survey of this.

Discuss this post on our message boards.